Updated 11:45 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. 3, after The Associated Press called the Senate and governor’s races.

If you went to bed thinking Texas was a lock for Republicans, you might want to sit down for this one.

Democratic state Rep. James Talarico defeated Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton in the U.S. Senate race in Texas on Tuesday, Nov. 3, according to The Associated Press. It’s the first statewide win for a Texas Democrat in more than 30 years.

And it wasn’t the only one. Democratic state Rep. Gina Hinojosa defeated Gov. Greg Abbott, who conceded Tuesday night, ending his bid for a record fourth term. Hinojosa will be the state’s first Democratic governor since Ann Richards.

So, what does that actually mean? More than you’d think.

In case you forgot how long it’s been

Before Tuesday, Democrats had not won a single statewide race in Texas since 1994, when Lt. Gov. Bob Bullock was re-elected. That was the longest statewide losing streak of any party in the country. The last Democrat to win a U.S. Senate race there was Lloyd Bentsen in 1988, and Richards left office in 1995.

For perspective, the last time a Democrat won statewide in Texas, “Friends” had just premiered.

So, how did this happen?

For starters, Paxton beat four-term Sen. John Cornyn in a May runoff, turning the race into a test of the GOP’s hardline wing versus its establishment. Paxton was impeached by the Texas House in 2023 on bribery and corruption charges and acquitted by the state Senate, and Democrats bet that history would cost him moderate Republicans and independents.

Turnout mattered too. More than 7.7 million Texans voted early, about 40.5% of registered voters, according to the Texas Tribune, and Talarico built big margins in the major metros and strong showings in the North Texas suburbs. The race became one of the most expensive non-presidential races in U.S. history, with spending topping half a billion dollars.

What changes tomorrow

The Senate math. Talarico flips a seat Republicans have held since 1993. Senate majorities often come down to one or two seats, so losing Texas forces the GOP to make up ground somewhere it never planned to. Republican strategists were already worried that money spent defending Texas could have gone to races in Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire or Georgia, Time reported.

The governor’s office, with a catch. Hinojosa takes over in January 2027 in a state where Republicans still control the Legislature. Expect gridlock, not an overhaul. Her biggest tools are the veto, the power to call or skip special sessions, and appointments to state boards and agencies.

The narrative. “Texas is turning blue” has been a punchline for years. It just stopped being one.

What changes for years

2028 gets weird. Texas has 40 electoral votes, second only to California, and a Democrat hasn’t carried it for president since Jimmy Carter in 1976. Two statewide wins don’t make it a swing state, but Republicans now have to spend real money defending it. That’s money that doesn’t go to Pennsylvania, Georgia or Arizona.

Six years of seniority. Talarico serves through January 2033. That means committee assignments, home-state projects and a national profile for a 30-something former teacher.

The bench finally fills up. One reason the drought lasted so long: strong candidates didn’t want to run in a state where Democrats always lost. That pitch just changed for 2028 and 2030, from comptroller and attorney general all the way up.

Redistricting pressure. Abbott led a mid-decade redistricting push to add Republican congressional seats. A Democratic governor now has a veto over the Legislature’s maps, and the governor elected in 2030 will be in office for the next round after the 2030 census. That makes 2030 an enormous fight.

The GOP reckoning. Republicans swapped a four-term incumbent for Paxton and lost the seat, and they lost the governor’s office in the same night. Expect a loud argument over what went wrong, and that fight will shape Texas Republican primaries for years.

At the same time…

Republicans have a fair counterpoint: one night doesn’t make Texas a blue state. These wins came with a damaged GOP Senate nominee and a strongly favorable national environment for Democrats, and a presidential year brings a different electorate. Republicans still hold the Legislature and most other statewide offices.

My take

To be honest, the biggest effect of tonight isn’t any single bill. It’s psychological. For three decades both parties treated Texas as settled, and that belief decided where money went, who ran and who bothered to vote. The streak is broken, and that whole calculation resets.

Whether Democrats can hold it is a different question. There’s no sense in calling Texas a swing state off one night. But nobody gets to call it a sure thing anymore, either.

Texas just got interesting.


Discover more from mcgraw media

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from mcgraw media

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading